Saturday, October 12, 2013

No Country for Smart Men

For the debt limit to even be an issue at all is a blight to our democracy, and indeed an insult to our intelligence.

In the US, congress requires the president to do things (which necessarily requires spending money) by passing laws, and also authorizes the president to collect certain taxes to pay for those actions. Should there be any shortfall in the taxes collected, the president is nonetheless required by law to spend the required amount of money by borrowing the difference. Furthermore, the president is bound by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which reads, in part:
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
Thus, to anybody even vaguely versed in math, the president clearly must borrow whatever is necessary to do the job that he or she is required to do by law, and pay the money back later (with some interest, naturally).

Yet, we have an additional law referred to as the "debt limit" that caps the amount that the president is allowed to borrow, and Republicans are using this to threaten President Obama. Not being able to borrow means the President will have to not comply with certain spending, collect more taxes, borrow beyond the cap, or borrow without paying it back. The first three options violate laws, and the last option violates the Constitution.

Democracies is often messy, because the more people are allowed to voice their opinions, the more opinions you will have, and resolving the differences among 300 million citizens is no doubt a difficult and messy job. However, what we're showing the world right now is that our democracy is not just messy, but downright stupid.

Thursday, October 3, 2013

The False Mother

For a political party that seems to enjoy being more patriotic than thou, the Republicans have shown great disrespect for the founding principles of this country.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed by both Houses of Congress and signed into law by the president, and further declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. For good measure, it was also one of the focal issues in the presidential election, in which the opponent lost. The basic provision of the ACA that insurers should not be allowed to reject costly customers, but in exchange customers cannot be allowed to get insurance only after getting sick (and costly), while probably still not as good as a single-payer system, is nonetheless astoundingly sensible.

Now, House Republicans generally abide by the so-called "Hastert Rule", under which a bill is brought to the floor only if it has the support of a majority of Republicans. In other words, Democratic votes are sidelined, and not permitted to join with a Republican minority to pass laws.

This 113th House of Representatives is composed of 435 members, 201 Democrats and 234 Republicans. This means that as few as 118 Republicans (just over 27% of the House) can prevent a bill from becoming law.

When this 27% is irresponsible enough to use government shutdown and default as a hostage to destroy the ACA, no sane person can say this is how the system is supposed to work. You might say that all they want is to delay the ACA, but seeing that these Republicans have already pointlessly voted dozens of times to repeal the ACA, you would be a special kind of stupid to think that the same tactic won't be used to delay it another year. You would be just adorable if you thought this tactic wouldn't be used against abortion, gay marriage, marijuana, and whatever else they don't like.

At its core, democracy requires the minority to accept the results of a vote. The sore losers have refused to accept the law, refused to accept the ruling of the Supreme Court, and refused to accept the results of a national election. They are dangerous and anti-democratic, the Republican politicians who are cowed by their threats are complicit, and the Republican voters who put them there are responsible. As in the story of King Solomon presented with a baby claimed by two mothers, the wise reader should not have to think very hard to decide who is the false mother willing to have the baby cut in half.

Sunday, September 29, 2013

Challenging the iPhone, Part V

Perhaps I should change the title of this post, seeing that many people may say that Android had already caught up to and surpassed the iPhone, indisputably in terms of market share, but also in areas such as performance and third party support. However, since nobody actually reads this, it doesn't really matter.

Anyway, the iPhone is doing fine, selling 9 million units in the first weekend of the new 5s and 5c models. Various caveats can be applied to that number, but it's still a lot of phones and a lot of profit for Apple. Furthermore, the iOS7 release has been adopted by as estimated 60% of eligible users within a week of release. Naysayers continue to worry about the "lack of innovation" from Cupertino, but the iPhone remains a strong and enviable business today.

In the Android universe, Samsung continues its dominance, and seems to be making all of the money that Apple did not make. I haven't observed any real discord between Google and Samsung, though I continue to suspect that the partnership is uneasy. Google is still trying to ship its own devices, but they don't seem to be getting very far. Samsung is also trying its hand at software, but there haven't been any big moves either.

There has been some strange drama, though. Andy Rubin left his post as head of Android (to a different job within Google), and VP of Product Management Hugo Barra left Google to work for Xiaomi. Former hTC VP of Product Design Thomas Chien and two other designers, on the other hand, were arrested on suspicion of fraudulent billing and leaking designs to a Chinese firm.

There are two noteworthy developments elsewhere, though. Microsoft has purchased the handset business of Nokia for US$7.2 billion, and private equity has purchased Blackberry (formerly RIM) for US$4.7 billion. There is still no real number three emerging.

But the thing to watch over the next year or two is probably whether a Chinese brand will emerge in the Android world. Xiaomi and Hwawei, at least, certainly appear to have the ambition for it.

Saturday, July 27, 2013

Free as in Sluts

I recently saw a really fun one in my spam folder. I didn't bother opening it, but the subject of the email "Free Access to Local Sluts" made me chuckle a bit.

Obviously, they'd have to be sluts, so that you can have sex without having to pay, or worry about a relationship. But more than that, they have to be local! I mean, who would want to drive for hours just to have sex? Finally, you won't even have to pay to find them, because why should a useful service charge money?

So basically, they seem to be asking, "are you a cheap and unattractive man who wants convenient and no-strings-attached sex?"

How the hell did I get on that mailing list?

Thursday, February 28, 2013

The Bravery of Ang Lee

Ang Lee (李安) is an amazing man. He is, of course, a famous director of some very good films, but what sets him apart in my mind is how incredibly diverse his filmography is.

Starting out with the so-called "Father Knows Best" trilogy, you could be forgiven to conclude that the time that he'll be a director of Asian-themed movies, perhaps expanding into the Asian-American experience at most. But since then, he's brought us into the worlds of Jane Austen, white suburban America, the American Civil War, martial arts, superheroes, gay cowboys, WWII China, the sixties, and an Indian boy. You may not actually like all of his movies, but you really must admire the courage behind his attempts.

For Ang Lee was not a trust fund baby who could just tinker. He is the son of an educator, failed college entrance exams twice, and had to rely on his wife's income while he was starting out. Once he's tasted some success, it would've been so tempting to just keep churning out the films that got him there. The pressure, for example, to shoot a prequel or sequel to Crouching Tiger was surely incredible, especially since the novel it was adapted from was the fourth of five books. Instead he chose to work on Hulk, which a normal person would've thought was a bridge too far, but his response to that failure was to venture into Brokeback Mountain!

It's as if he could not see his prior experience, or the color of his skin, as limitations to what he could try. He was over 50 when he directed Brokeback, so apparently age isn't a problem either.

I aspire to having this kind of courage.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Fat Lady Singing

Opera just announced that they are abandoning their own web rendering engine in favor of WebKit. This is yet another example of the effects that free-beer software projects sponsored by large companies can have on smaller players. To be frank, they lasted longer than I thought they would, but in the end the efficiencies of software monoculture wins again. Opera might survive just by building a better browser on top of WebKit than everybody else, but I doubt it. I think Free-beer software paid for by Apple devices and Google advertising has claimed another victim.

Saturday, February 9, 2013




首先,「愛用國貨」的出發點就是一個問題。hTC 手機用的是 Android 軟體,主要是美國 Google 公司寫的,手機裡的各種零件多半是許多國家研發生產的。從網上拆機圖片中,看得出電池是中國生產,認得出的晶片有韓國三星和海力士、美國高通和 Synaptics 等公司出品。究竟什麼叫做國貨?真的仔細去檢查,iPhone 用的台灣零件是多是少還不一定呢。裕隆集團後來解釋嚴鼓勵員工多愛用國貨,想必覺得這出發點並沒錯。






『我某日在酒後說出這些話,非常後悔。第一,hTC 的手機固然好用,許多外商廠牌的手機裡面也個有許多台灣人的貢獻,本不該說只有 hTC 算是「國貨」。第二,這些話會脫口而出,真是喝太多了,以後會交代身邊的人提醒,不會再喝這麼醉。最重要的,用什麼手機是個人的自由,既不關愛國,更輪不到我來批評什麼,批評也絕不該用粗口。這裡謹對讓這些話所傷害到的人致以歉意,也對身為一個公眾人物造成壞榜樣抱歉。』